ARRCC meeting with Kelvin Thomson MP

Present: myself, Sister Margaret Hinchey (Catholics in Coalition for Justice and Peace), Rev Rod Benson (Baptist Union of Australia), Fr. Claude Mostovik (Pacific Calling Partnership), Rev Niall Reid.

We had quite a long chat, and covered quite a bit of ground. Thomson described himself as a ‘disciple of Al Gore’, and was very supportive of real action on climate change.

He criticized the attitude of, ‘We shouldn’t do it if they aren’t’ to justify Australia doing no more than others. He said this was like a rower on a boat saying they won’t pull until the next guy did.

Thomson mentioned that he envisions an Australia with a decentralized power structure, solar PVs on every roof, and regretted the fact that some of the attempts to move in this direction were being rolled back as they were ‘too successful’.

Addressing the Libs’ criticism that the price on carbon would impact the poor, he acknowledged that there was an issue, saying that he had been to visit a constituent, an old lady. Her house was as cold inside as out: she couldn’t afford electricity for heating. But he said that the detailed policy on consumer relief for the carbon tax was close, perhaps weeks away.

Thomson expressed his support for the goal of 0.7% GNI for foreign aid, agreeing with us that this was closely linked to climate change, which will hit the poorest the hardest.

He emphasized that the media battle is key, saying he was disppointed the Australian media persists in promoting denialism as if it were a genuine option, especially since Rupert Murdoch has strongly voiced his acceptance of the climate change consensus and has pledged to make his companies carbon neutral.

I asked him whether he saw any possibility in combining the
incentive-based so-called ‘Direct Action’ of the Libs with the carbon price. He said there were some aspects that might be useful, but as a whole it is a political document not to be taken seriously as a scientific alternative.

On the whole, Thomson agreed whole-heartedly with the moral vision presented by ARRCC, including the notion of interconnectedness, and our responsibility for future generations.

In fact, I’d have to say that all the politicians I met today shared both a recogntion of the urgency of the problem, and the moral conviction that something needs to be done about it. The main division is clearly in terms of means. Having talked with Greg Hunt, and having read the Libs’ ‘Direct Action’ policy, I must admit I find it hard to take it seriously: full of infantile slings at the ‘great big new tax’ and very thin on actually demonstrating that carbon sequestration in the soil is a viable solution. Business as usual, and the public will pay to clean up the mess.

Nevertheless, as we repeated again and again, our purpose in coming here was not to get sidetracked into the details of policy, but to impress on the decision makers here in Canberra of the gravity of the situation, and the shared vision that all of us from such different backgrounds have. We have done our part if we inspire them to take the right path, rather than the convenient one.

One thought on “ARRCC meeting with Kelvin Thomson MP

  1. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/climate-of-fear-scientists-face-death-threats/2185089.aspx?storypage=0

    Climate of fear: scientists face death threats

    BY ROSSLYN BEEBY SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT REPORTER

    04 Jun, 2011 12:00 AM

    Australia’s leading climate change scientists are being targeted by a vicious, unrelenting email campaign that has resulted in police investigations of death threats.
    The Australian National University has confirmed it moved several high-profile climate scientists, economists and policy researchers into more secure buildings, following explicit threats to their personal safety.

    Scientists at universities in NSW and Queensland have told of being moved to high security buildings, where their names do not appear on staff directory lists or on their office door.

    ”If you want to find me, it’s impossible unless you make an appointment, sign in with some form of photo identification, and are personally escorted to my door,” one scientist said.

    ”That’s directly as a result of threats made against me.”

    More than 30 researchers across Australia ranging from ecologists and environmental policy experts to meteorologists and atmospheric physicists told The Canberra Times they are receiving a stream of abusive emails threatening violence, sexual assault, public smear campaigns and attacks on family members.

    Among the scientists being targeted is Australian National University climate institute director Professor Will Steffen.

    Others include University of NSW climate change research co-director Professor Andy Pitman and University of Melbourne meteorology professor and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lead author Professor David Karoly.

    Many scientists spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they feared the email attacks would escalate if they were identified.

    Several scientists have installed upgraded home security systems and switched to unlisted phone numbers after receiving threats that their homes and cars would be damaged.

    One scientist said he was advised by police to install a ”panic button” security alarm in his university office after receiving death threats. Others have removed all contact numbers from their work websites, and deleted social media sites after these were defaced with abusive comments and obscene photographs. One researcher told of receiving threats of sexual assault and violence against her children after her photograph appeared in a newspaper article promoting a community tree-planting day as a local action to mitigate climate change.

    Australia’s new chief scientist, former ANU vice-chancellor Professor Ian Chubb has condemned these email threats as ”an outrageous attack” on open and public debate.

    ”These hurtful attacks are intended to intimidate scientists, to scare them off and stop them from participating in public discussions on climate change. They are the antithesis of democratic debate,” Professor Chubb said.

    Federal Climate Change Minster Greg Combet said harassment of scientists or other researchers was unacceptable.

    ”There is nothing wrong with having a genuine debate but there is no place for harassment or bullying. People whipping up anxiety over a carbon price should temper their language and engage in rational debate rather than irrational scare mongering,” Mr Combet said.

    Australian Greens deputy leader Christine Milne said the emails were ”an orchestrated, extremist anti-science campaign attempting to threaten and intimidate people into silence.”

    Outspoken climate science critic, Queensland Nationals senator Barnaby Joyce also condemned the attacks as malicious and counter-productive.

    ”No one deserves that kind of behaviour,” Senator Joyce said.

    University of NSW senior psychology lecturer Jason Mazanov said the emails were indicative of a ”closed room” mentality where people have lost all sense of what is normal.

    ”They send a threatening email with no thought of the social cost or consequences,” he said.

    The AFP have advised that if an individual receives death threats and/or violently abusive emails, they should contact their state or territory police.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s